Friday, April 20, 2012

Hello Everyone,

Here is an good article about what is happening in Ontario with regards to our religious freedoms.
Please read and let me know what you think.


There's a line for religion in public arena


By BRIAN MACLEOD

As religious issues increasingly creep into the political realm, the temperature of the debate is rising.

Given the changing demographics of the Canadian population, new lines are being drawn on religious tolerance--or in some cases, intolerance--but with each line, comes a new controversy.

Christmas, in particular, finds some public officials twisting themselves into knots trying not to address the religious aspect of the season, often after some misguided soul renames the decorated Scotch pine a "holiday tree."

There is nothing wrong with displaying festive symbols signifying a certain religious group is celebrating a special occasion. Erecting a Christmas tree in city hall, setting up a menorah in the school cafeteria or placing a display of lanterns in a public building's foyer isn't spreading the word of a religious group, or subjecting others to their teachings. It's just drawing attention to the fact that it's an important time of year for a religious community.

But that's where the line should be drawn. Several public school boards have undergone

painful debates recently over whether to continue to allow the Gideons to distribute New Testaments in schools to Grade 5 students whose parents sign permission slips.

This is a 60-year tradition that should end. Schools shouldn't be used to hand out religious teachings. Bluewater District School Board trustees dealt with many nasty e-mails and phone calls before they voted to end the practice this week. It was just as bad in Waterloo in June when a resident asked to be able to hand out the Qur'an to students. Waterloo Region District School Board chair Kathleen Woodcock said the reaction from the community to allowing non-Christian religious groups to distribute materials in schools was "disturbing."

Another line some religious organizations don't want to cross is the province's pending legislation that would force publicly funded school boards to allow students to set up gay after-school clubs. Since homosexuality is not accepted by Catholic teaching, some say this is forcing Catholics to act against their faith.

But the Catholic boards will have to live with it, and so will private religious schools that rent space in public schools.

The Dalton McGuinty government introduced the Accepting Schools Act after the suicide deaths of two gay teens highlighted the issue. Gays aren't the only ones bullied in schools, but a recent Statistics Canada report shows they are targeted by hate crimes more than any other group.

The Ontario Catholic School Trustees' Association says gays should be respected, but Catholic teaching is that homosexuality is a sin. Since these school clubs don't have to be called gay-straight alliances, Catholic schools will call them Respecting Difference groups, in which gays or any others can join, but members should not be engaged in political activism.

Whether this clashes with the legislation, which says such groups should promote "awareness, understanding and respect for people of all sexual orientations and gender identities," remains to be seen.

The bill aims to "encourage a positive school climate and prevent inappropriate behaviour, including bullying, sexual assault, gender-based violence and incidents based on homophobia."

Some religious officials resent the emphasis on gender-based bullying or use of the term "homophobia." But pretending that gays aren't singled out is to defy reality. Ask the students.

The legislation doesn't target religious schools; it targets bullying, and stresses the reality of bullying against gays.

Once the bill is passed, it will be a reality religious schools must address.


Hello Everyone,

I have been coming out to see you all these last few weeks to explain the cuts to education and trying to make you aware of the impacts that they will have.
One of the items on the Ministry's cuts is the Credit Cap. This blog contains some frequently asked questions that could help you understand the impacts this cut can have to your student. Thank you to OCSTA for this information.

Credit Cap re: Ontario's Four-Year High School Program

Among the initiatives announced as part of the government's 2012 Budget was the government's plan to put a cap on high school credits. Starting in 2013-14 full funding for high school credits will be capped at 34 credits. Credits beyond 34 will be funded at Adult Education grant rates which will reduce funding to boards for students going above the cap of 34 credits.

To help answer the many questions arising in the community around this decision, the Ministry of Education published a number of "Frequently Asked Questions" (FAQs) on the Ministry website. Those FAQs are listed below:

From the Ministry of Education website at http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/students/faqs.htmlhttp://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/students/faqs.html

Q: What is the new “34-credit cap”?
The ministry is putting in place a cap that would allow students to take up to 34 credits. Thirty credits are required to graduate, so this would allow for an additional four credits which is equivalent to a semester.

Over a decade ago, Ontario moved to four years of high school, but many students are still taking that additional fifth year.

Last year, there were almost 20,000 students in Ontario who returned for at least another semester despite having already graduated in four ears – that's 13 per cent of last year's students.

That's why we need to shift the culture in our schools and encourage students to graduate on time.

The vast majority of students should be able to earn the 30 credits they need to graduate in four years.

Students who want to take more than 34 credits can do so, but the ministry would fund the school board at a reduced rate for those credits.

Q: Will I be charged a fee after my 34th credit? Will I be able to return to high school?
No, you will not have to pay for any additional credits.

Our intent is to encourage better planning of your educational pathway early on so that you can get all the credits you need in four years.

Yes, if needed, you can still take more than 34 credits.

Q. If I am currently in Grade 12 and plan to return next year, will this impact me?
No. You will not be impacted.

Q: When will this start?
The ministry will implement the cap and reduced funding for boards as of September 2013.

Q. If I fail a credit, does that count toward my 34 credits?
No. Only successful credits count toward your total.

Q: Can I take more than 34 credits? What if I want to upgrade my marks?
Yes, you can still take more than 34 credits. Yes, you can still upgrade your marks.

We will work with your school board and schools to support you in planning your educational pathway so that you can get all the credits you need in four years.

Each board will determine how this will be implemented for students taking their 35th credit and beyond. Options may include enrolling students in part-time studies, e-learning, night school or summer school.

Q: If I take the same course twice to upgrade my mark, does this count as one or two credits?
Both courses would count toward the 34-credit cap, but only one credit counts toward the 30 credits required for graduation.

Q: Are you doing anything to help boards work with their students?
The ministry is working on a document to help each student better plan their path through school and move forward to the next stage in their lives.

The first version will be available this fall, and it will focus on grades 11 and 12.

A second and more complete version will cover kindergarten to Grade 12. This should be available in the spring of 2013.

Q. If I have questions about specific course or program offerings, who can I talk to?
Please contact your local school board.